Choate v. Arms
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Adopting Report and Recommendations re 89 Report and Recommendation; Overruled 91 Motion for De Novo Determination; Denying as moot 96 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; Denying 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/17/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
DERRICK JUSTIN CHOATE,
Chief Judge Crenshaw
For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court hereby rules as
(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 89) is ADOPTED;
(2) Phil Arms’ Motion for De Novo Determination (Doc. No. 91), construed as objections
to the Report and Recommendation, is OVERRULED; and
(3) Phil Arms’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 24) is DENIED.
In light of these rulings, Derrick Choate’s Request for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 96) to
respond to Phil Arm’s Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. This case is returned to Magistrate Judge
Brown for further pretrial case management and the setting of a projected trial date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?