Hutchings v. Shoupe et al

Filing 29

ORDER: Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 28 ), recommending that the Court grant Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 17 ). Plaintiff did not file timely objections. Afte r a de novo review of the record, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. The Court agrees that dismissal is required because of Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 17 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/19/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (afs)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COOKEVILLE DIVISION
HAROLD HUTCHINGS,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHERRIFF ODDIE SHOUPE and
MAJOR JEWELL BILLBREY,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:16-cv-00100
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW

ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No.
28), recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.
17). Plaintiff did not file timely objections. After a de novo review of the record, the Report and
Recommendation is ADOPTED. The Court agrees that dismissal is required because of Plaintiff’s
failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall
enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE