Cain v. Tennessee Technological University et al

Filing 56

ORDER: As set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 52 ) are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 49 ) is ADOPTED IN PART AND SET ASIDE IN PART. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 24 ) is GRANTED IN PART. Cain's federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Cain's state law claims and they are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter a final judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/18/2019. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COOKEVILLE DIVISION
SARAH BETH CAIN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL
UNIVERSITY, et al.,
Defendants.

NO. 2:17-cv-00055

ORDER
As set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. No.
52) are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 49) is ADOPTED IN PART
AND SET ASIDE IN PART. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED IN
PART. Cain’s federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court declines to
exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Cain’s state law claims and they are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Clerk shall enter a final judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE