Rivera v. Social Security Administration

Filing 17

ORDER: Having undertaken the de novo review required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16 ) is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED ; (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 13 ) is DENIED; (3) The Commissioner's decision terminating Supplemental Security Income is AFFIRMED; and (4) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. T he Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/18/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
MEGAN R. RIVERA
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:17-cv-0077
Chief Judge Crenshaw

ORDER
The Magistrate Judge has entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) in this social
security case recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record
(Doc. No. 13) be denied and that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be affirmed.
No objections have been filed. Having undertaken the de novo review required by Rule 72 of the
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly,
(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) is hereby APPROVED AND
ADOPTED;
(2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED;
(3) The Commissioner’s decision terminating Supplemental Security Income is
AFFIRMED; and
(4) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal
Rules of Appellate Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE