Sibley v. Social Security Administration
Filing
20
ORDER: Accordingly, (1) The R&R (Doc. No. 19 ) is ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Sibley's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 16 ) is DENIED; and (4) the Social Security Administration's denial of benefits is AFFIRMED . The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/21/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
SUMMER JONES SIBLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:18-cv-00027
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Holmes has entered a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No.
19) in which she recommends that Summer Sibley’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative
Record (Doc. No. 16) be denied. Sibley has filed no objections to the R&R. Having reviewed the
matter de novo in accordance with F. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court agrees with the recommendation
because substantial evidence supports the Social Security Administration’s denial of benefits.
Accordingly,
(1) The R&R (Doc. No. 19) is ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2)
Sibley’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED; and (4)
the Social Security Administration’s denial of benefits is AFFIRMED.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?