Russo v. Social Security Administration
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendatio n is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, and Russo's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED. This case is hereby REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge's R&R. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/11/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
KIMBERLY A. RUSSO,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREW M. SAUL,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 2:18-cv-00033
ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 18)
recommending that the Russo’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 14),
to which the Commissioner responded (Doc. No. 16) in opposition, be granted and the
Commissioner’s decision be reversed. No timely objections have been filed to the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, and Russo’s Motion for Judgment on
the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED. The Commissioner’s decision is
REVERSED. This case is hereby REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent
with the Magistrate Judge’s R&R.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?