Brannon v. Social Security Administration et al

Filing 16

ORDER: Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15 ) recommending that Brannon's Motion for Judgment On the Record (Doc. No. 10 ) be denied and the Social Security Administration's decision be affirmed. No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition because th ere is no error that would necessitate remand. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED, and Brannon's Motion for Judgment On the Record (Doc. No. 10 ) is DENIED. The Social Security Administration's decision is AFFIRMED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/1/2019. (jm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
BRYAN DOUGLAS BRANNON,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 2:18-cv-00051
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW

ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15)
recommending that Brannon’s Motion for Judgment On the Record (Doc. No. 10) be denied and
the Social Security Administration’s decision be affirmed. No objections have been filed to the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule
72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition
because there is no error that would necessitate remand. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED, and Brannon’s Motion for
Judgment On the Record (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED. The Social Security Administration’s
decision is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE