Winnett et al v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Filing 387

ORDER: Currently pending before the court are the plaintiffs' Motions for Jury Trial (Winnett, 3:06-cv-0235, Docket No. 376; Kerns, 3:06-cv-01113, Docket No. 185) and Caterpillar Inc.'s opposition thereto (Winnett, Docket No. 384; Kerns, Do cket No. 193). For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the plaintiffs' Motions are DENIED, and the plaintiffs' jury demands are stricken. Furthermore, the Winnett plaintiffs' alternative request for a non-advisory jury or an advisory jury is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/16/09. (dt)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION GARY T. WINNETT, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) CATERPILLAR INC., ) ) Case No. 3:06-CV-00235 Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) Hon. Aleta A. Trauger v. ) ) Mag. Judge Joe B. Brown INTERNATIONAL UNION, UAW, et al. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Third-Party Defendants. ) Class Action JUDITH K. KERNS, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) CATERPILLAR INC., ) ) Case No. 3:06-CV-01113 Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) Hon. Aleta A. Trauger v. ) ) Mag. Judge Joe B. Brown INTERNATIONAL UNION, UAW, et al. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Third-Party Defendants. ) Class Action ORDER Currently pending before the court are the plaintiffs' Motions for Jury Trial (Winnett, 3:06-cv-0235, Docket No. 376; Kerns, 3:06-cv-01113, Docket No. 185) and Caterpillar Inc.'s opposition thereto (Winnett, Docket No. 384; Kerns, Docket No. 193). For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the plaintiffs' Motions are DENIED, and the plaintiffs' jury demands are stricken. Furthermore, the Winnett plaintiffs' alternative request for a non-advisory jury or an advisory jury is DENIED. 1 It is so ordered. _______________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?