American National Property and Casualty Company v. Campbell Insurance, Inc et al
Filing
225
ORDER granting 224 Motion for Permission to File Reply Memorandum. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 4/12/10. (dt)
ORDER _______ Motion granted. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY Plaintiff, v. CAMPBELL INSURANCE, INC., TOMMY L. CAMPBELL, and MARSHA COLLEEN CAMPBELL, and A 2 Z INSURANCE, INC. LIBERTY MUTUAL INS. CO., and MONTGOMERY MUTUAL INS.CO. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) s/ John S. Bryant U.S. Magistrate Judge
Case No.: 3:08-CV-00604 Judge Robert L. Echols Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant JURY DEMAND
MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM L.R. 7.01(b) Come the Defendants, Campbell Insurance, Inc., Tommy L. Campbell, Marsha Colleen Campbell, and A 2 Z Insurance, Inc. (hereinafter "Campbell Defendants") and, pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(b) move the Court for permission to file a Reply Memorandum. The Campbell Defendants filed a Motion to Compel concerning Plaintiff's response to their Fourth Request for Production of Documents. The motion was filed on March 18, 2010. The Plaintiff filed a response on April 5, 2010. The Campbell Defendants request leave of the Court to file a reply to the response filed by the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Fourth Request for Production of Documents was actually an objection to each and every one of the sixteen requests. No documents were produced in response to the Request for Production of Documents. Plaintiff, in the Response in Opposition to the Motion to Compel, indicates the Campbell Defendants failed to articulate an issue in this matter with regard to which the requested documents might be relevant. Plaintiff, in the Third Amended Complaint [Document 160], alleged a violation of the Tennessee Uniform Trade Secrets Act by all Defendants. Paragraph 172 on page 29 of the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?