Daugherty et al v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al

Filing 66

ORDER: For the reasons explained in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, Plaintiffs' Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Ruling (Docket Entry No. 51) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall have sixty (60) days to depose Defendant s' representatives. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 39) is hereby DENIED without prejudice to refile following the completion of deposition discovery. Defendants shall have ninety (90) days to refile their motion. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/13/11. (af)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JAMES RAY DAUGHERTY, STEVE
)
DANIEL ALLEN, WILLIAM ORMAN
)
KNOX, J.C. HOLLINGSWORTH,
)
DARYLE RYCARDO DOWELL, SR.,
)
RICKY WILFORD BALTHROP,
)
SHELIAH RHONDA HUNTER,
)
WILLIAM ROBERT MAUPIN,
)
STEVEN EDWARD COUNTER,
)
ROBERT S. HEATHCOCK, KERRY B. )
STAMPER, DONNA FAY REKART,
)
JOHNNY LEE BUTLER, TOM BAKER )
JOHNSON, BRENDA COLEMAN,
)
REBECCA SPICER, DONALD ALLEN )
SPILLERS, DENNIS ALAN BRAZZELL , )
and KENNY WAYNE JOHNSON
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED
)
AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND
)
AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT
)
WORKERS OF AMERICA (“UAW”)
)
and UNITED AUTO WORKERS
)
LOCAL UNION 737 (“UAW LOCAL
)
737”),
)
)
Defendants.
)

No. 3:08-cv-00695
JUDGE SHARP
MAGISTRATE JUDGE BROWN

ORDER
For the reasons explained in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith,
Plaintiffs’ Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Ruling (Docket Entry No. 51) is hereby
GRANTED.

Plaintiffs shall have sixty (60) days to depose Defendants’ representatives.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 39) is hereby DENIED without

prejudice to refile following the completion of deposition discovery. Defendants shall have
ninety (90) days to refile their motion.
It is so ORDERED.

_______________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE