Martinez v. McGraw et al.
Filing
409
ORDER denying 404 Motion for New Trial. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/8/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JAMES MARTINEZ
v.
SAMUEL TIMOTHY MCGRAW, et al.
)
)
) NO. 3-08-0738
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for a New Trial or For Reconsideration
(Docket No. 404). Defendants have filed a brief in opposition thereto (Docket No.407). Plaintiff’s
Motion is DENIED.
The Court may grant a Rule 59 motion to alter or amend if there is (1) a clear error of law;
(2) newly discovered evidence; (3) an intervening change in controlling law; or (4) a need to prevent
manifest injustice. Intera Corp. v. Henderson, 428 F.3d 605, 620 (6th Cir. 2005).
Motions to alter or amend, brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59, are entrusted to the Court’s
sound discretion. Nagle Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 175 F.R.D. 251, 254 (E.D. Mich. 1997).
A motion under Rule 59 is not an opportunity to re-argue a case. Roger Miller Music, Inc. v.
Sony/ATV Publishing, LLC, 477 F.3d 383, 395 (6th Cir. 2007). Rather, a motion under Rule 59 must
either clearly establish a manifest error of law or must present newly discovered evidence. Id. A
motion to alter or amend should not be used to relitigate previously considered issues, to submit
evidence which could have been previously submitted in the exercise of reasonable diligence, or to
attempt to obtain a reversal of a judgment by offering the same arguments previously presented.
Nagle Industries, 175 F.R.D. at 254.
The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s arguments in connection with its prior Order
(Docket No. 402), declines to amend that Order or to order a “new trial” in this case. Plaintiff has
not carried his burden of establishing any of the reasons for relief under Rule 59. Therefore,
Plaintiff’s Motion (Docket No. 404) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?