Alvion Properties, Inc. et al v. Weber et al

Filing 545

ORDER: Having conducted an independent review of the matter in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. Accordingly, (1) The Report and Recommendation 514 and the Report and Recommendati on 518 are hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) The Motion for Summary Judgment 471 filed by third-party defendant Elizabeth Melland is hereby GRANTED, and the third-party complaint against that Defendant is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) The "Motion For Equitable Relief" 509 and "Amended Motion For Equitable Relief" 513 filed by Defendants Bernd H. Weber and Claude J. Chauveau are hereby DENIED. Said denial is without prejudice to those Defendant's right to challenge Plaintiffs' Lanham Act claims at trial or by way of a properly supported motion. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/12/12. (xc:Pro se parties by email notification)(tmw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
ALVION PROPERTIES, INC., et al.

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
BERND H. WEBER, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
*********************************** )
BERND H. WEBER, et al.
)
)
Counter-Claimants, )
)
HAROLD M. REYNOLDS, et al.,
)
)
Counter-Defendants.)

No. 3:08-0866
Judge Sharp

ORDER
The Magistrate Judge has entered a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Docket No.
514) in this case, recommending that the unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No.
471) filed by third-party defendant Elizabeth Melland be granted, and that the third-party complaint
against her be dismissed. The Magistrate Judge has also entered an R & R (Docket No. 518)
recommending that the “Motion For Equitable Relief” (Docket Entry No. 509) and “Amended
Motion For Equitable Relief” (Docket Entry No. 513) filed by Defendants Bernd H. Weber and
Claude J. Chauveau be denied. No objections have been filed to either R & R.
Having conducted an independent review of the matter in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P.
72, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. Accordingly,
(1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 514) and the Report and Recommendation

1

(Docket Entry No. 518) are hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED;
(2) The Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 471) filed by third-party defendant
Elizabeth Melland is hereby GRANTED, and the third-party complaint against that Defendant is
hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
(3) The “Motion For Equitable Relief” (Docket Entry No. 509) and “Amended Motion For
Equitable Relief” (Docket Entry No. 513) filed by Defendants Bernd H. Weber and Claude J.
Chauveau are hereby DENIED. Said denial is without prejudice to those Defendant’s right to
challenge Plaintiffs’ Lanham Act claims at trial or by way of a properly supported motion.
It is SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2