Guzman v. Green Pastures Farm, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 14 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 11 ) is hereby GRANTED; This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of a final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 7/21/09. (cc: pltf by reg and cert mail)(km)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JESUS RAMIREZ GUZMAN, Plaintiff, v. GREEN PASTURES FARMS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This is an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., in which the Magistrate Judge has issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Docket Entry No. 14) recommending that Defendant's unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. (Docket Entry No. 11). The R & R was issued on Case No. 3:08-0957 Judge Echols June 4, 2009, and Plaintiff has filed no objections thereto, even though he was informed in the R & R that any objections needed to be filed within ten (10) days of receipt of the R & R (Docket Entry No. 14 at 3-4). Where, as here, no objections are made to the R & R, "[t]he district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision, receive further evidence, or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is premised solely on its contention that Plaintiff's Complaint is untimely. The record shows that Plaintiff's employment with Defendant was terminated on 1 May 3, 2006, he received his final paycheck on May 5, 2006, and that paycheck cleared Defendant's checking account on May 9, 2006. However, suit was not filed until August 29, 2008.1 As the Magistrate Judge properly noted, the FLSA generally has a two year statute of limitations unless there is a willful violation, in which case a three year statute of limitations applies. 29 U.S.C. § 255(a). "A cause of action is deemed to accrue, as a general rule, `at each regular payday immediately following the work period during which the services were rendered for which the wage or overtime compensation is claimed.'" Hughes v. Region VII Area Agency on Aging, 542 F.3d 169, 187 (6th Cir. 2008)(citation omitted). In this case, Plaintiff's Complaint contains no allegations of willful conduct and therefore the two year statute of limitations applies. Plaintiff was last paid on May 5, 2006 and the check His Complaint, which was not filed until cleared on May 9, 2006. August 29, 2008, is untimely. Accordingly, the Court hereby rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 14) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 11) is hereby GRANTED; and (3) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Suit was filed on that date in the General Sessions Court of Williamson County and removed by Defendant to this Court on September 26, 2008. 2 1 Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of a final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). It is SO ORDERED. ______________________________ ROBERT L. ECHOLS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?