Montano-Perez et al v. Durrett Cheese Sales, Inc. et al

Filing 191

ORDER granting 188 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/20/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)

Montano-Perez et al v. Durrett Cheese Sales, Inc. et al

Doc. 191

Motion GRANTED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION __________________________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) ) DURRETT CHEESE SALES, INC., et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________________________) JUANA MONTANO-PÉREZ, et al.

Civ. No. 3:08-cv-1015 JURY DEMAND Judge Trauger

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION AND INCORPORATED SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT GREG DURRETT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO ASSESSMENT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS On December 9 and 10, 2010, Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Assessment of Attorneys' Fees Against Greg Durrett and Bill of Costs, respectively. (Docs. 177-178, 182). On December 15, 2010, Defendant Greg Durrett filed a Memorandum and Declaration of Counsel in opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion and Costs Bill. (Doc. 187). In accordance with Local Rule 7.01(b), Plaintiffs seek leave of the Court to file a reply memorandum to address Defendant Durrett's arguments in opposition to Plaintiffs' request for attorneys' fees and costs. In his opposition Memorandum, Defendant Durrett takes the position that Plaintiffs waived in settlement any rights to seek statutory attorneys' fees and costs against him. Id. Plaintiffs had been proceeding on the assumption that they retained all such rights, and believe that their Reply will assist the Court in understanding why Plaintiffs believe they did not waive any rights to seek attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the agreed judgment portion of the parties' settlement agreement. For these reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court permit them to file the Reply

Dockets.Justia.com