Sims v. Matthew Walker Comprehensive Health Facility

Filing 51

ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a document entitled "Notice of Nonsuit" (Docket No. 48) and a proposed Order (Docket No. 49). Plaintiff seeks to dismiss her action without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Defendant has filed an op position to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Docket No. 50). Currently pending before this Court are Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 43) and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 45). Plaintiff cannot avoid responding to the pending Motions by attempting to voluntarily dismiss her action. Therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) (2), the Court declines to sign Plaintiff's proposed Order or dismiss this action at this time. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/1/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(af)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JACQUELYN DENISE SIMS v. MATTHEW WALKER COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH FACILITY ) ) ) NO. 3:08-1114 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ) ORDER Plaintiff has filed a document entitled "Notice of Nonsuit" (Docket No. 48) and a proposed Order (Docket No. 49). Plaintiff seeks to dismiss her action without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Defendant has filed an opposition to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Docket No. 50). Currently pending before this Court are Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 43) and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 45). Plaintiff cannot avoid responding to the pending Motions by attempting to voluntarily dismiss her action. Therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), the Court declines to sign Plaintiff's proposed Order or dismiss this action at this time. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?