Murphy v. Sanders et al

Filing 69

ORDER: The Court rules as follows: (1) the 65 R&R entered on September 21, 2009, is hereby ACCEPTED; (2) Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Mike Leavitt, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, is hereby DISMISSED for failure to effectuat e proper service of process and for failure to state a claim; (3) all other pending motions are hereby DENIED AS MOOT; (4) this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 5) entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 10/22/09. (xc: Pltf by reg. and cert. mail) (ab)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION LESTER G. MURPHY, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) HUMPHREYS COUNTY JUVENILE ) COURT, JUDGE ANTHONY SANDERS, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) No. 3:08-1122 JUDGE ECHOLS ORDER Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") entered by the United States Magistrate Judge on September 21, 2009 (Docket Entry No. 65), recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's claim against the remaining Defendant, Mike Leavitt, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, for failure to effectuate proper service and for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff Lester G. Murphy, Sr., did not file timely objections to the R&R even though he was informed that he had ten (10) days after service of the R&R to file such objections. In reviewing an R&R, the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Having reviewed the R&R in light of the record, the Court finds that no error of fact or law appears. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) the R&R entered on September 21, 2009 (Docket Entry No. 65), is hereby ACCEPTED; (2) Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Mike Leavitt, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, is hereby DISMISSED for failure to effectuate proper service of process and for failure to state a claim; 1 (3) all other pending motions are hereby DENIED AS MOOT; (4) this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (5) entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). It is so ORDERED. ___________________________________ ROBERT L. ECHOLS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?