Henley v. Little et al

Filing 21

ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, the Court rules as follows: (1) the Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of Defendants George Little and Ricky Bell (Docket Entry No. 8) is hereby GRANTED; (2) all other pending moti ons are hereby DENIED AS MOOT; (3) this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (4) entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). Plaintiff has sufficient time to appeal the Court's dismissal of his § 1983 Complaint to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals prior to his scheduled execution on February 4, 2009. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 1/26/09. (af)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION STEVE HENLEY v. GEORGE LITTLE, et al. ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 3:08-1148 JUDGE ECHOLS

ORDER In accordance with the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, the Court rules as follows: (1) the Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of Defendants George Little and Ricky Bell (Docket Entry No. 8) is hereby GRANTED; (2) all other pending motions are hereby DENIED AS MOOT; (3) this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (4) entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of final judgment in accordance

with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). Plaintiff has sufficient time to appeal the Court's dismissal of his § 1983 Complaint to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals prior to his scheduled execution on February 4, 2009.
It is so ORDERED. ______________________________________ ROBERT L. ECHOLS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE