Oshop et al v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services et al

Filing 90

ORDER: For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion for Attorney's Fees By Rutherford Board of Education Defendants 76 is DENIED. It is so ordered. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/21/10. (tmw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOHN OSHOP, GLENDA OSHOP, and C.O., by and through her natural guardians and next friends, JOHN OSHOP, and GLENDA OSHOP, Plaintiffs, v. RUTHERFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion for Attorney's Fees By Rutherford Board of Education Defendants (Docket No. 76) is DENIED. It is so ordered. Enter this 21st day of June 2010. Case No.: 3:09-cv-0063 Judge Trauger ALETA A. TRAUGER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?