Siddle et al v. Crants et al

Filing 462

ORDER granting 461 Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/8/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
Motion GRANTED. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BRUCE K. SIDDLE, et al. Plaintiffs, vs. DOCTOR R. CRANTS, et. al, Defendants. BRUCE K. SIDDLE, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. CONNECTGOV, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:09-cv-00175 Judge Aleta Trauger ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 3:09-cv-01137 Judge Aleta Trauger MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY BRIEF TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES FILED BYDEFENDANTS GEORGE V. CRAWFORD, III AND GULETT, SANFORD, ROBINSON & MARTIN, PLLC COMES NOW the Defendants, George V. Crawford, III (“Mr. Crawford”) and Gullett, Sanford, Robinson & Martin, PLLC (“GSRM”), by and through counsel of record, Glassman, Edwards, Wyatt, Tuttle & Cox, P.C., and files this Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support of its Motion for Attorney’s Fees in two cases, Siddle v. Crants, Jr., No. 3:09-cv-00175 and Siddle v. ConnectGov, Inc., No. 3:09-cv-01137. In further support of this request, Defendants would show as follows: 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?