Heriges v. Wilson County, Tennessee et al

Filing 28

ORDER denying 26 Motion For Extension of Time to Respond. It is hereby ORDERED that the defendants shall respond to the plaintiffs 22 Counter Motion for Summary Judgment by June 8, 2010, and the plaintiff may file an optional reply by June 15, 2010. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 05/28/2010. (ab)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION PAIGE HERIGES, Plaintiff, v. WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, and BILL ARNOLD, officially and individually, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil No. 3:09-0362 Judge Trauger

ORDER The defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond (Docket No. 26) is DENIED. It is hereby ORDERED that the defendants shall respond to the plaintiff's Counter Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 22) by June 8, 2010, and the plaintiff may file an optional reply by June 15, 2010. This case is set for trial on August 3, 2010. The defendants have had the plaintiff's Counter Motion for two (2) weeks, and it basically raises the same issues as the defense Motion for Summary Judgment. An extension of time for response is unnecessary. It is so ORDERED. ENTER this 28th day of May 2010. ________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER U.S. District Judge