Heriges v. Wilson County, Tennessee et al

Filing 34

ORDER: For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the plaintiff's Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment 22 is DENIED. The defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 15 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. That is, the plaint iff's claims against Arnold in his official capacity are DISMISSED, the plaintiff's TPPA claim against both Arnold and Wilson County is DISMISSED and the plaintiff's PEPFA claim against Arnold is DISMISSED. It is so ordered. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/18/10. (tmw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION PAIGE HERIGES, Plaintiff, v. WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, and BILL ARNOLD, officially and individually, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 3:09-0362 Judge Trauger

ORDER For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the plaintiff's CounterMotion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 22) is DENIED. The defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 15) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. That is, the plaintiff's claims against Arnold in his official capacity are DISMISSED, the plaintiff's TPPA claim against both Arnold and Wilson County is DISMISSED and the plaintiff's PEPFA claim against Arnold is DISMISSED. It is so ordered. Enter this 18th day of June 2010. ___

_________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER United States District Judge