Taylor Swift v. Malcolm Matthews, et al

Filing 87

ORDER: The Clerk is directed to terminate as defendants Various John Does, Various Jane Does, and Various XYZ Corporations. The Clerk is also directed to terminate Brendan Schiff as a defendant in this case. Status Report due by 08/17/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 08/02/2010. (ab)

Taylor Swift v. Malcolm Matthews, et al

Doc. 87

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION TAYLOR SWIFT ) ) v. ) ) MALCOLM MATTHEWS; RENEE ) SUSAN MITCHELL; LOUIS MOORE; ) MARTIN D. QUATTLEBAUM; ) MARSHA DYONNE TYLER; ) BRENDAN SCHIFF; MELLISSA ) LIEBERMAN; EDWARD FRIEDMAN; ) KENNETH JOHNSON; ROBERT ) VINCENT ESTRONZA; TAIEF ) HASSON WALLACE; VANCE HILL; ) VERNANDO SMITH; ANDRE ) ANTHONY JONES; FRANK PARSONS; ) WILBERT G. PRINCE; CARLO PONTI ) SMITH; MERVIN A. BROWN; ERIC ) LOPP; JEFFREY L. WATKINS; ) DENNIS LANE WEAVER; KILO ) JAMES; TYRONE "PIGGY" SQUIRES; ) BURRELL DICKERSON; and BRAULIO ) RIVIERA )

No. 3-09-0442

ORDER On July 12, 2010, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint (Docket Entry No. 86), naming additional defendants. As a result, the Clerk is directed to terminate as defendants Various John Does, Various Jane Does, and Various XYZ Corporations. Inasmuch as the plaintiff's claims against defendant Schiff were dismissed by order entered August 28, 2009 (Docket Entry No. 53), the Clerk is also directed to terminate Brendan Schiff as a defendant in this case. By August 17, 2010, the plaintiff shall file a status report, indicating whether she intends to seek entry of default against the defendants for whom service of process has been effected1 and, if At the August 26, 2009, case management conference and as reflected in the order entered August 27, 2009 (Docket Entry No. 52), plaintiff's counsel indicated that she was inclined to file all requests for entry of default after service was effected and the plaintiff's tour was completed.
1

Dockets.Justia.com

so, when, and/or what other action the plaintiff intends to take and when, whether and when the case can be unsealed, and whether the plaintiff believes that a case management conference should be scheduled. It is so ORDERED.

JULIET GRIFFIN United States Magistrate Judge

2