Taylor Swift v. Malcolm Matthews, et al

Filing 88

STATUS REPORT Plaintiff's Report on Status of Case by Taylor Swift. (Rose, Natalya)

Download PDF
Taylor Swift v. Malcolm Matthews, et al Doc. 88 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN NASHVILLE TAYLOR SWIFT, Plaintiff v. MALCOLM MATTHEWS; RENEE SUSAN MITCHELL; LOUIS MOORE; MARTIN D. QUATTLEBAUM; MARSHA DYONNE TYLER; MELLISSA LIEBERMAN; EDWARD FRIEDMAN; KENNETH JOHNSON; ROBERT VINCENT ESTRONZA; TAIEF HASSON WALLACE; VANCE HILL; VERNANDO SMITH; ANDRE ANTHONY JONES; FRANK PARSONS; CARLO PONTI SMITH; WILBERT G. PRINCE; MERVIN A. BROWN; ERIC LOPP; JEFFREY L. WATKINS; DENNIS LANE WEAVER; KILO JAMES; TYRONE "PIGGY" SQUIRES; BURRELL DICKERSON; and BRAULIO RIVIERA, Defendants Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-0442 Judge Wiseman Magistrate Judge Griffin FILED UNDER SEAL PLAINTIFF'S REPORT ON STATUS OF CASE The plaintiff, Taylor Swift ("Plaintiff"), by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Court's Order dated August 2, 2010 (Document 87), reports as follows on the status of this case: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1. Plaintiff has contemporaneously filed a Motion for Entry of Default Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) against the defendants who have been served with process, defendants Martin D. Quattlebaum, Robert Vincent Estronza, Vance Hill, Vernando Smith, Andre Anthony Jones, Frank Parsons, Wilbert G. Prince, Carlo Ponti Smith, Mervin A. Brown, Eric Lopp, Jeffrey L. Watkins, Dennis Lance Weaver, Kilo James, Tyrone "Piggy" Squires, Burrell Dickerson, and Braulio Riviera ("Defendants"). 2. Upon the entry of default against the Defendants by the Clerk of the Court, Plaintiff will seek a default judgment, including entry of permanent injunction, against the Defendants, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). Thereafter, Plaintiff intends to seek an order for destruction of counterfeit articles seized pursuant to the Court's Temporary Restraining Order and Order of Seizure of Counterfeit Goods, entered on May 19, 2009 (Docket 12), Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Temporary Restraining Order and Order of Seizure of Counterfeit Goods, entered on May 28, 2009 (Document 17), and/or the Preliminary Injunction and Order of Seizure of Counterfeit Goods, entered on June 17, 2009 (Document 33), and in accordance with 15 U.S.C. § 1118. 3. Plaintiff has further contemporaneously filed a Motion to Unseal File and Docket Sheet, in accordance with 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d)(8). 4. In light of the above, Plaintiff does not believe that a case management conference is necessary at this time. 2 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Natalya L. Rose W. Michael Milom (No. 002803) David S. Crow (No. 020699) Natalya L. Rose (No. 021701) MILOM JOYCE HORSNELL CROW PLC 3310 West End Avenue, Suite 610 Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Telephone: (615) 255-6161 mmilom@mjhc-law.com dcrow@mjhc-law.com nrose@mjhc-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Taylor Swift 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that service of the foregoing Plaintiff's Report on Status of Case is being accomplished through delivery by U.S. First Class Mail, postage pre-paid, this 17th day of August, 2010, upon the following: Martin D. Quattlebaum 8556 Kendrick Road Jonesboro, Georgia 30126 Robert Vincent Estronza 1281 Brockett Road Clarkston, Georgia 30021 Vance Hill 6169 Charring Cross Court Lithonia, Georgia 30058 Vernando Smith 1119 Redantrian Court Stone Mountain, GA 30088 Andre Anthony Jones 8330 Bluff Road Columbia, South Carolina 29214 Frank Parsons 1622 Curry Street Columbia, South Carolina 29204 Wilbert G. Prince 1837 Barbara Drive 11A Columbia, South Carolina 29223 Carlo Ponti Smith 2225 Hwy 1 South, Apt. 905 Elgin, South Carolina 29073 Mervin A. Brown 1627 Carnegie Street, Apt. B Columbia, South Carolina 29204-1472 Eric Lopp 153-20 123 Avenue Jamaica, New York 11434 4 Jeffrey L. Watkins 667 Westwood Drive Lexington, South Carolina 29073-8038 Dennis Lance Weaver 3911 St. Andrews, Apt. 302 Columbia, South Carolina 29201 /s/ Natalya L. Rose Natalya L. Rose 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?