Gary R. Prince Revocable Trust et al v. Blackwell et al

Filing 112

ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 3/24/2011 at 1:00 PM, to address scheduling deadlines for the remainder of the case, including the filing of the amended complaint, the response thereto, the remaining discovery, a proposed trial date, and any other appropriate matters. If counsel for the parties agree, the conference may be held telephonically, to beinitiated by defendants counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 3/16/11. (dt)

Gary R. Prince Revocable Trust et al v. Blackwell et al

Doc. 112

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION GARY R. PRINCE REVOCABLE TRUST; GARY R. PRINCE TRUSTEE; GARY PRINCE; CHRISTOPHER CAMPBELL; WILLIAM LISTON; and DIANE L. LISTON v. CHRIS BLACKWELL, personally and d/b/a Blackwell Construction; WILLIAM BLACKWELL; DBS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING OF CLARKSVILLE, INC.1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 3090475

O R D E R By order entered March 15, 2011 (Docket Entry No. 111), the plaintiffs motion to amend (Docket Entry No. 110) was granted and the case rereferred to the Magistrate Judge for new discovery deadlines and trial date. A case management conference is scheduled on Thursday, March 24, 2011, at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom 764, U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, TN, to address scheduling deadlines for the remainder of the case, including the filing of the amended complaint, the response thereto, the remaining discovery, a proposed trial date, and any other appropriate matters. If counsel for the parties agree, the conference may be held telephonically, to be initiated by defendants counsel. It is so ORDERED. JULIET GRIFFIN United States Magistrate Judge

By order entered July 22, 2009 (Docket Entry No. 16), DBS & Associates Engineering of Clarksville, Inc. (DBS) was substituted for DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc., originally named as a defendant in this case. By order entered November 17, 2010 (Docket Entry No. 103), the plaintiffs claims against defendant DBS were dismissed with prejudice.

1

Dockets.Justia.com