Gary R. Prince Revocable Trust et al v. Blackwell et al

Filing 117

ORDER: By order entered 7/22/2009 16 , the Clerk was directed to substitute DBS Engineering of Clarksville, Inc. for defendant DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. and to terminate DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. as a defendant. Therefore, th e Clerk shall terminate DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. as a defendant in this action. Even though the plaintiffs listed DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. as a defendant in their amended complaint 114 , the plaintiffs made it clear that th ey are asserting no claims against DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc., and DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. should remain terminated as a defendant. DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/1/11. (dt)

Download PDF
Gary R. Prince Revocable Trust et al v. Blackwell et al Doc. 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION GARY R. PRINCE REVOCABLE TRUST; GARY R. PRINCE TRUSTEE; GARY PRINCE; CHRISTOPHER CAMPBELL; WILLIAM LISTON; and DIANE L. LISTON v. CHRIS BLACKWELL, personally and d/b/a Blackwell Construction; WILLIAM BLACKWELL; DBS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING OF CLARKSVILLE, INC.1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3090475 O R D E R By order entered July 22, 2009 (Docket Entry No. 16), the Clerk was directed to substitute DBS Engineering of Clarksville, Inc. for defendant DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. and to terminate DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. as a defendant. Therefore, the Clerk shall terminate DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. as a defendant in this action. Even though the plaintiffs listed DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. as a defendant in their amended complaint (Docket Entry No. 114), the plaintiffs made it clear that they are asserting no claims against DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc., and DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc. should remain terminated as a defendant. It is so ORDERED. JULIET GRIFFIN United States Magistrate Judge By order entered July 22, 2009 (Docket Entry No. 16), DBS & Associates Engineering of Clarksville, Inc. (DBS) was substituted for DBS & Associates of Clarksville, Inc., originally named as a defendant in this case. By order entered November 17, 2010 (Docket Entry No. 103), the plaintiffs claims against defendant DBS were dismissed with prejudice. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?