Jackson v. Covenant Transport et al

Filing 29

ORDER: Motion to Compel 28 is Denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 12/15/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)

Download PDF
Jackson v. Covenant Transport et al Doc. 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JERRI LEIGH JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. COVENANT TRANSPORT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:09-0614 Judge Trauger/Bryant ORDER Plaintiff has filed her "Motion to Compel Court (U.S. Marshall Service) to Send Covenant Transport Summons, Right to Sue, EEOC, EEOC charge & All of the Original Complaint Materials Submitted 6/29/09." (Docket Entry No. 28). It appears from the record that on December 7, 2010, the Clerk issued a summons to Covenant Transport (Docket Entry No. 23). By earlier order of the Court (Docket Entry No. 20), the Court directed that upon receipt from plaintiff of the completed service packet, service of process upon the defendant shall be accomplished through the U.S. Marshal's Service. Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that the summons and a copy of the complaint are to be served upon each defendant. Moreover, documentary exhibits filed with the complaint ordinarily are served along with the complaint, and the Court has no reason to believe that this has not occurred, or is in the process of occurring, in this case. Since the relief that plaintiff Jackson seeks in this Dockets.Justia.com motion has likely already occurred, or already is in the process of occurring, her motion is DENIED as moot. This ruling is without prejudice to plaintiff Jackson's right to file a similar motion if it should appear later that service of process upon the defendant has not occurred in the normal fashion. It is so ORDERED. s/ John S. Bryant JOHN S. BRYANT United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?