Linfoot et al v. MD Helicopters, Inc. et al

Filing 135

ORDER granting 134 Motion for Leave to File a Reply in support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 5/20/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

ORDER:
Motion granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
GARY LINFOOT and wife
MARILYN LINFOOT, and GREGORY
COOPER,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs,
v.
MD HELICOPTERS, INC.,
MCDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER
COMPANY, L-3 COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION, and
KAMATICS CORPORATION,
Defendants.

U.S. Magistrate Judge

CASE NO: 3:09-cv-639
JUDGE KEVIN H. SHARP

PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO FILE A REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
______________________________________________________________________________
Plaintiffs respectfully request leave of the Court to file a reply to Defendant McDonnell Douglas
Helicopter Company’s (“MDHC”) Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiffs submit
their reply, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, to provide this Court with full and complete facts and to correct
presumably unintentional but significant inaccuracies in MDHC’s Response brief. These inaccuracies
include, but are not limited to, the statement that Dyncorp International LLC – the party that Plaintiffs
seek to join in this action – modified the helicopter at the center of this matter, and also includes
statements concerning the status of discovery in the related Delaware matter.

Respectfully submitted,

KREINDLER & KREINDLER LLP

1