Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan et al v. Tuner et al

Filing 63

ORDER granting 60 Motion for Leave to Reply Brief to Motion to Amend Initial Case Management Order or, in the alternative, to Schedule Case Management Conference and to Postpone and Re-Set Trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 10/21/10. (dt)

Download PDF
Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan et al v. SagePoint Financial, Inc., et al. Doc. 63 ORDER: Motion granted. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan, Dennis Turner, as Trustee, et al., Plaintiffs v. SagePoint Financial, Inc., et al. Defendants SagePoint Financial, Inc., Counterclaimant v. Dennis Turner, as Trustee for the Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan, et al., Counter-Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) U.S. Magistrate Judge CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-cv-00724 Judge John T. Nixon Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles SAGEPOINT FINANCIAL, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO AMEND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO SCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND POSTPONE AND RE-SET TRIAL COMES NOW SAGEPOINT FINANCIAL, INC. ("SagePoint"), by and through its undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(b), respectfully requests leave of Court to file a Reply in Support of its Motion to Amend Initial Case Management Order or, in the Alternative, to Schedule Case Management Conference, and Postpone and Re-set Trial (the "Motion") (Docket No. 46). In support hereof, SagePoint states that the Plaintiffs' 26-page Response to SagePoint's Motion (the "Response") (Docket No. 56) reveals that the Motion is, in fact, unopposed. However, instead of simply stating that the Motion is unopposed, the Plaintiffs have used the Response as a platform to re-argue other motions that were fully briefed as long Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?