Bearden et al v. Honeywell International Inc.
Filing
124
ORDER granting 123 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/30/11. (dt)
ORDER: _______ Motion granted. s/ John S. Bryant IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE U.S. Magistrate Judge
JAMES BEARDEN AND SHEILA BEARDEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 3:09-cv-01035 Judge Trauger Magistrate Judge Bryant DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL COMPLEX LITIGATION
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(b), Plaintiffs James and Sheila Bearden respectfully move this Court for leave to file a Reply in Support of Its Second Motion to Compel Production of Documents. A copy of Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum is filed contemporaneously herewith as Attachment 1. A reply memorandum is both necessary and appropriate to address inaccuracies raised and attacks lodged by Defendant in Defendant's Response filed on March 17, 2011. A Reply will aid the Court in its resolution of the pending motion because it corrects inaccurate statements made in the Response and responds to issues of law that were raised by Defendants in their Response. For the foregoing reasons, and based on the entire record in this matter, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant Plaintiffs have to file the Reply Memorandum and that an Order deeming the Reply Memorandum filed be entered by the Court.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?