Bearden et al v. Honeywell International Inc.

Filing 136

ORDER: Plaintiffs' Third Motion to Compel 110 is Denied as Moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 6/29/11. (dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JAMES BEARDEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 3:09-1035
Judge Sharp/Bryant
Jury Demand

O R D E R
Plaintiffs Bearden have filed their third consolidated
motion to compel (Docket Entry No. 110).
During a telephone case management conference with the
undersigned

Magistrate

Judge

on

June

24,

2011,

counsel

for

defendant Honeywell reported to the Court that Honeywell had been
able to obtain a complete copy of the Honeywell call center
database referenced in this motion, and that it has been, or
shortly will be, produced to plaintiffs.

From a review of the

remaining items sought by plaintiffs’ motion (Docket Entry No. 110
at 3-4), it appears that the remaining items have been addressed by
this Court’s memorandum and order of June 29, 2011 (Docket Entry
No. 134).

For this reason, plaintiffs’ third motion to compel

(Docket Entry No. 110) is DENIED as moot.
It is so ORDERED.
s/ John S. Bryant
JOHN S. BRYANT
United States Magistrate Judge