Hutten v. Knight et al
Filing
77
ORDER: For the reasons explained in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 46 is GRANTED IN PART andDENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to Counts IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII. With respect t o the remaining counts, the motion is DENIED as to Lieutenant Knight and Officer Maxwell in their individual capacities and GRANTED as to all other defendants. Defendants' Motion to Strike 63 is DENIED AS MOOT.Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/26/12. (dt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
TIMOTHY SCOTT HUTTEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
LT. RICKY KNIGHT, JOHN
MAXWELL, OFFICERS JOHN DOE,
and THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD,
TENNESSEE,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:10-cv-00105
JUDGE SHARP
MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRIFFIN
ORDER
For the reasons explained in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith,
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 46) is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to Counts IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII. With
respect to the remaining counts, the motion is DENIED as to Lieutenant Knight and Officer
Maxwell in their individual capacities and GRANTED as to all other defendants. Defendants’
Motion to Strike (Docket Entry No. 63) is DENIED AS MOOT.
It is so ORDERED.
_______________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?