Hutten v. Knight et al

Filing 77

ORDER: For the reasons explained in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 46 is GRANTED IN PART andDENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to Counts IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII. With respect t o the remaining counts, the motion is DENIED as to Lieutenant Knight and Officer Maxwell in their individual capacities and GRANTED as to all other defendants. Defendants' Motion to Strike 63 is DENIED AS MOOT.Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/26/12. (dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
TIMOTHY SCOTT HUTTEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
LT. RICKY KNIGHT, JOHN
MAXWELL, OFFICERS JOHN DOE,
and THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD,
TENNESSEE,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:10-cv-00105

JUDGE SHARP
MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRIFFIN

ORDER
For the reasons explained in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith,
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 46) is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to Counts IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII. With
respect to the remaining counts, the motion is DENIED as to Lieutenant Knight and Officer
Maxwell in their individual capacities and GRANTED as to all other defendants. Defendants’
Motion to Strike (Docket Entry No. 63) is DENIED AS MOOT.
It is so ORDERED.

_______________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE