Savoie v. Martin et al

Filing 57

ORDER: For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, pltf's 50 Motion to Set Aside Order of Dismissal is GRANTED IN PART, and the 47 Order and 48 Judgment are VACATED. The court deems the 51 Second Amended Complaint filed and defts' 42 , 44 , 45 motions to dismiss pending. Pltfs shall respond to the motions within 21 days of date of entry of this Order; defts shall have 14 days from the filing of pltfs' responses to reply. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/12/10. (rd)

Download PDF
Savoie v. Martin et al Doc. 57 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CHRISTOPHER JOHN SAVOIE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JUDGE JAMES G. MARTIN, III, et al., Defendants. ORDER For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Plaintiff's Rule 60 Motion to Set Aside Order of Dismissal (Docket No. 50) is GRANTED IN PART, and the September 17, 2010 Order and Judgment (Docket Nos. 47-48) are VACATED. The court deems the Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 51) filed and deems the defendants' motions to dismiss (Docket Nos. 42, 44, and 45 renewing Docket Nos. 20, 24, and 26) pending and challenging the Second Amended Complaint. The plaintiffs shall file their response to the motions to dismiss within 21 days of the date of entry of this Order. The defendants will have 14 days from the date of the filing of the plaintiffs' response to file optional replies. It is so ordered. Enter this 12th day of October 2010. ________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER United States District Judge ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:10-0327 Judge Trauger Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?