Direct Line Corporation v. Carrington et al

Filing 256

ORDER: The defendant is hereby given notice that, within 30 DAYS after service of this notice, he MUST either submit to this court the $455 appellate filing fee or a properly supported motion to pursue his appeal in forma pauperis that compli es with Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The defendant is notified that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of his appeal. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/3/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DIRECT LINE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL L. CARRINGTON and JOHN DOE(S), Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:10-cv-0423 Judge Trauger ORDER Judgment in favor of the plaintiff was entered on June 6, 2013. The defendant has filed his timely Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 254). The defendant, however, did not submit the $455 appellate filing fee along with his notice of appeal, or an application to appeal in forma pauperis. The defendant is hereby given notice that, within 30 DAYS after service of this notice, he MUST either submit to this court the $455 appellate filing fee or a properly supported motion to pursue his appeal in forma pauperis that complies with Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The defendant is notified that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of his appeal. It is so ORDERED. Aleta A. Trauger United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?