Direct Line Corporation v. Carrington et al

Filing 277

ORDER: Plaintiff's counsel complied with Judge Trauger's Order on April 22, 2014. Docket No. 276 . Apparently in the interim, the original notebook submitted at the May 1, 2012 hearing was located. That original notebook, therefore, is officially made part of the record on appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 4/23/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

DIRECT LINE CORPORATION
Plaintiff,

vs.

MICHAEL L. CARRINGTON and
JOHN DOE(s),
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:10-0423
JUDGE TRAUGER/KNOWLES
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER
On April 21, 2014, Judge Trauger entered an Order regarding a hearing exhibit that was
accepted into evidence by the undersigned during a May 1, 2012 hearing held in this action.
Docket No. 274. At the time Judge Trauger entered her Order, the referenced exhibit could not
be located by the Court. Judge Trauger, therefore, directed Plaintiff to file electronically a
complete set of the documents that were part of the notebook and to do so within fourteen (14)
days of the entry of her Order. Judge Trauger further required that the notebook exhibit be
accompanied by counsel’s affidavit or declaration certifying that the exhibit is a true and correct
copy of the exhibit admitted into evidence at the May 1, 2012, hearing. Judge Trauger’s Order
stated, “Once it has been filed, the exhibit SHALL be deemed part of the record of this court for
purposes of appeal.” Docket No. 274.
Plaintiff’s counsel complied with Judge Trauger’s Order on April 22, 2014. Docket No.
276.

Apparently in the interim, the original notebook submitted at the May 1, 2012 hearing
was located. That original notebook, therefore, is officially made part of the record on appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

E. Clifton Knowles
United States Magistrate Judge

2