Zweig et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 10

AGREED ORDER AND STIPULATION: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, is hereby substituted for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart Supercenter as the defendant in this action. It is further ORDERED that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart Supercenter is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, is the only remaining defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 6/16/10. (dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION TONYA ZWEIG and husband WARREN ZWEIG Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. D/B/A WAL-MART SUPERCENTER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 3:10- cv-00535 JUDGE NIXON MAGISTRATE JUDGE KNOWLES JURY DEMAND

AGREED ORDER AND STIPULATION SUBSTITUTING WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, AS THE PROPER DEFENDANT As evidenced by the signatures below of the parties' lawyers, it appears to the Court that Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, is the proper defendant in this matter. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, is hereby substituted for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart Supercenter as the defendant in this action. It is further ORDERED that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a WalMart Supercenter is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, is the only remaining defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTER this the ___ day of June, 2010.

_____________________________ JUDGE