New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Blackjack Cove, LLC et al

Filing 216

ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court denies New Hampshire's first motion for partial summary judgment, 86 ; grants in part (as to establishing the fact that the insurance policy at issue does not require Blackjack to repair or replace the damaged property) and denies in part (as to all other issues) Blackjack Cove's motion for partial summary judgment, 88 ; grants in part (as to Blackjack's claim for damages stemming from New Hampshire&# 039;s alleged failure to "total" docks at the marina) and denies in part (as to all other issues) New Hampshire's second motion for partial summary judgment, 133 ; and denies New Hampshire's motion to strike, 139 . It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/26/14. (tmw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. BLACKJACK COVE, LLC Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:10-cv-607 Judge Sharp ORDER For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court denies New Hampshire’s first motion for partial summary judgment, (Docket No. 86); grants in part (as to establishing the fact that the insurance policy at issue does not require Blackjack to repair or replace the damaged property) and denies in part (as to all other issues) Blackjack Cove’s motion for partial summary judgment, (Docket No. 88); grants in part (as to Blackjack’s claim for damages stemming from New Hampshire’s alleged failure to “total” docks at the marina) and denies in part (as to all other issues) New Hampshire’s second motion for partial summary judgment, (Docket No. 133); and denies New Hampshire’s motion to strike, (Docket No. 139). It is SO ORDERED. _________________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE  1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?