Shelton v. Ray et al

Filing 100

ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 67 , to which no Objections have been timely filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted an d approved. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss 50 filed by Defendants Ray, Fortner and Himes is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Ray and Fortner and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Hines in her official capacity are DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/18/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

LORENZO A. SHELTON
v.
GAYLE RAY, et al.

)
)
) NO. 3-10-0684
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)

ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket
No. 67), to which no Objections have been timely filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and
Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.
Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 50) filed by Defendants Ray, Fortner and
Himes is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Ray and
Fortner and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Hines in her official capacity are DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE