Cochran v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Filing
32
ORDER: On February 7, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 28), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of l aw of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion For Temporary Restraining Order (Docket No. 2) and Motion For Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 4) are DENIED AS MOOT. It is so ORDERED. ENTER this 28th day of February 2011. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/28/11. (af)
<![CDATA[
Cochran v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Doc. 32
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BOBBY COCHRAN, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER On February 7, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 28), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion For Temporary Restraining Order (Docket No. 2) and Motion For Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 4) are DENIED AS MOOT. It is so ORDERED. ENTER this 28th day of February 2011.
Civil No. 3:10-0753 Judge Trauger Magistrate Judge Griffin
________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER U.S. District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
