Coats et al v. Nashville Limo Bus, LLC et al

Filing 121

ORDER: A hearing on the pending motions in this matter was held on 3/1/2012. For the reasons stated in open Court, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiffs' Motion for Award of Attorney Fees and Costs of the Action 100 is hereby DENIED as Mo ot due to Plaintiffs Notice of Withdrawal of Request for Attorneys' Fees 113 ; (2) Plaintiffs Motion for Execution on Trust Account is DENIED 107 ; (3) Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 111 is DENIED; (4) Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdraw of Request for Attorneys' Fees, and Motion for Its Own Award of Attorneys' Fees 114 is DENIED; (5) Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees Aga inst Plaintiffs David and Tammy Coats 117 is DENIED; (6) Defendants' Motion for Entry of Order of Dismissal 103 is GRANTED. The Court approves the Settlement Agreement and dismisses the remaining claims with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/1/12. (dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DAVID COATS, et al.,
v.
NASHVILLE LIMO BUS, LLC, etal.,

)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:10-0759
Judge Sharp

A hearing on the pending motions in this matter was held on March 1, 2012. For the reasons
stated in open Court, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Award of Attorney Fees and Costs of the Action (Docket No. 100)
is hereby DENIED as Moot due to Plaintiff’s Notice of Withdrawal of Request for Attorneys’ Fees
(Docket No. 113);
(2) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Execution on Trust Account is DENIED (Docket No. 107);
(3) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
(Docket No. 111) is DENIED;
(4) Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Notice of Withdraw of Request for Attorneys’ Fees,
and Motion for Its Own Award of Attorneys’ Fees (Docket No. 114) is DENIED;
(5) Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees Against Plaintiffs David and Tammy Coats
(Docket No. 117) is DENIED;
(6) Defendants’ Motion for Entry of Order of Dismissal (Docket No 103) is GRANTED.
The Court approves the Settlement Agreement and dismisses the remaining claims with prejudice.
The Clerk is directed to close this case.
It is SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE