Harden v. Allied Barton Security Service

Filing 64

ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion for Summary Judgment 45 filed by Defendant Allied Barton Security Service is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff Ceci l Ray Harden's failure to promote claims, and his claim that he was terminated in retaliation for participating in an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission investigation, but DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's claim that he was terminated on the basis of his race. A final pretrialconference on that remaining claim will be held on Monday, September 30, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. with the jury trial to commence at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, October 15, 2013. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/7/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
CECIL RAY HARDEN
Plaintiff,
v.
ALLIEDBARTON SECURITY
SERVICE
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:10-00779
Judge Sharp

ORDER
For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion for Summary
Judgment (Docket No. 45) filed by Defendant Allied Barton Security Service is hereby GRANTED
IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff Cecil Ray
Harden’s failure to promote claims, and his claim that he was terminated in retaliation for
participating in an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission investigation, but DENIED with
respect to Plaintiff’s claim that he was terminated on the basis of his race. A final pretrial
conference on that remaining claim will be held on Monday, September 30, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. with
the jury trial to commence at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, October 15, 2013.
It is SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE