Hancock et al v. Benning et al

Filing 77

ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel 72 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant Anesthesia Medical Group shall identify to Plaintiffs, by 4/3/2013, the designated representative who will attend and testify on its behalf at trial. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/28/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DAVID HANCOCK, et al. v. THOMAS R. BENNING, M.D., et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-10-0935 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Relief from Order Limiting Defendants to Three Expert Witnesses (Docket No. 68) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant Anesthesia Medical Group, P.C. to Identify Designated Representative (Docket No. 72). Plaintiffs have represented that they do not oppose Defendants’ Motion so long as Defendants identify by name those experts Defendants intend to call by the close of business on April 1, 2013. Docket No. 73. Defendants’ Motion for Relief (Docket No. 68) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants shall identify to Plaintiffs, by name, those experts they intend to call by April 3, 2013. The Court notes that Defendants have filed their list of witnesses (Docket No. 76), which may moot Plaintiffs’ request. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (Docket No. 72) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant Anesthesia Medical Group shall identify to Plaintiffs, by April 3, 2013, the designated representative who will attend and testify on its behalf at trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?