Protective Industries, Inc. v. Ratermann Manufacturing, Inc. et al

Filing 292

ORDER granting 271 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/31/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
PROTECTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC. (d.b.a.,
CAPLUGS),
Plaintiff,
v.
RATERMANN MANUFACTURING, INC.,
GEORGE RATERMANN, PROGRESSIVE
PLASTICS, INC., AND HENRY
BUERMANN,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-01033
JUDGE Sharp
Magistrate Griffin

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION IN
LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF PLAINTIFF’S CORPORATE SIZE AND
FINANCIAL STATUS UNDER SEAL
Pursuant to ¶ 9 of the Stipulated Protective Order (Docket Entry No. 49, pp. 4-5), as well
as § 5.07 of the Administrative Practices and Procedures for Electronic Case Filing, Defendants
Ratermann Manufacturing, Inc., George Ratermann, Progressive Plastics, Inc., and Henry
Buermann (collectively, “Defendants”) respectfully request leave of Court to file their Response
in Opposition to the Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiff’s Corporate Size and
Financial Status and accompanying exhibit under seal because they refer to information
designated by the parties as “confidential” and/or “attorney’s eyes only” under the Stipulated
Protective Order.