Protective Industries, Inc. v. Ratermann Manufacturing, Inc. et al

Filing 322

ORDER: Motion to Dismiss Their Invalidity and Inequitable Counterclaims Without Prejudice 318 and Consent Motion 321 are GRANTED. Defendants' Counterclaims for Invalidity and Inequitable Conduct are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Wit h this ruling, there remains nothing for the Court's consideration and, accordingly, the Clerk shall enter a final judgment in favor of Defendants in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 based upon this ruling and the Court's 1/31/2013 Order 316 that, among other things, granted Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment and Motions to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/15/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
PROTECTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.,
(d.b.a. CAPLUGS),
Plaintiff,
v.
RATERMANN MANUFACTURING,
INC., GEORGE RATERMANN,
PROGRESSIVE PLASTICS, INC. and
HENRY BUERMANN,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:10-01033
Judge Sharp

ORDER

Defendants Ratermann Manufacturing, Inc.’s and Progressive Plastics, Inc.’s Motion to
Dismiss Their Invalidity and Inequitable Counterclaims Without Prejudice (Docket No. 318) and
Plaintiff Protective Industries, Inc.’s notice of consent thereto, which has been docketed as a
“Consent Motion” (Docket No. 321), are hereby GRANTED. Defendants’ Counterclaims for
Invalidity and Inequitable Conduct are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
With this ruling, there remains nothing for the Court’s consideration and, accordingly, the
Clerk shall enter a final judgment in favor of Defendants in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 based
upon this ruling and the Court’s January 31, 2013 Order (Docket No. 316) that, among other things,
granted Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and Motions to Dismiss.
It is SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE