Koffman v. Bell

Filing 33

ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the Court finds that the petition (Docket Entry No.1) for writ of habeas corpus lacks merit. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Rule 8(a), Rules -- § 2254 Cases. Should the petitioner file a timely notice of appeal from this order, such notice shall be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), which will NOT issue because the petitioner has been unable to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/15/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(af)

Download PDF
Koffman v. Bell Doc. 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION LARRY P. KOFFMAN Petitioner, v. RICKY BELL, WARDEN Respondent. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] No. 3:10-1065 Judge Trauger O R D E R In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the Court finds that the petition (Docket Entry No.1) for writ of habeas corpus lacks merit. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Rule 8(a), Rules -- § 2254 Cases. Should the petitioner file a timely notice of appeal from this order, such notice shall be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), which will NOT issue because the petitioner has been unable to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. It is so ORDERED. ____________________________ Aleta A. Trauger United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?