Koffman v. Bell
Filing
37
ORDER: In the order of dismissal, the Court determined that a certificate of appealability should not issue. That ruling has rendered the petitioners 36 Motion for an extension of time MOOT and said Motion is DENIED for that reason. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/31/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
<![CDATA[
Koffman v. Bell
Doc. 37
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
LARRY P. KOFFMAN Petitioner, v. RICKY BELL, WARDEN Respondent.
] ] ] ] ] ] ]
No. 3:10-1065 Judge Trauger
O R D E R On March 15, 2011, an order (Docket Entry No.33) was entered dismissing the instant habeas corpus action. Presently before the Court is the petitioner's Motion (Docket Entry No.36) seeking an extension of time in which to file an application for a certificate of appealability. In the order of dismissal, the Court determined that a
certificate of appealability should not issue. That ruling has rendered the petitioner's Motion for an extension of time MOOT and said Motion is DENIED for that reason. It is so ORDERED.
____________________________ Aleta A. Trauger United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
