Carrigan v. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc.
Filing
73
ORDER: For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, summary judgment is GRANTED in the plaintiff's favor on his claim for breach of contract and AJGRMS' Motion for Default 55 is DENIED. The only liability issue remaining is A JGRMS' counterclaim for abuse of process, which the court may rule on as a matter of law at the pretrial conference. The court has already found that the plaintiff is liable to AJGRMS on its breach of contract counterclaim in the amount of $ ;47,611.69. Thus, the only damages issue remaining is the amount of damages the plaintiff is entitled to recover as a result of AJGRMS' breach of the non-compete clause contained in the Sale Agreement. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/30/12. (dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
GARY CARRIGAN,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER RISK
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:10-cv-1089
Judge Trauger
ORDER
For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, summary judgment is
GRANTED in the plaintiff’s favor on his claim for breach of contract and AJGRMS’ Motion for
Default (Docket No. 55) is DENIED. The only liability issue remaining is AJGRMS’
counterclaim for abuse of process, which the court may rule on as a matter of law at the pretrial
conference. The court has already found that the plaintiff is liable to AJGRMS on its breach of
contract counterclaim in the amount of $47,611.69. Thus, the only damages issue remaining is
the amount of damages the plaintiff is entitled to recover as a result of AJGRMS’ breach of the
non-compete clause contained in the Sale Agreement.
It is so ordered.
Enter this 30th day of May 2012.
_______________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?