Lindley v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.

Filing 59

ORDER: The settlement agreement the Magistrate Judge thought the parties had reached has apparently blown up. Accordingly, it appears that absent the request of the parties there is nothing further that remains to be done by the undersigned and the matter of the amendment is before Magistrate Judge Bryant. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/18/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DENNIS S. LINDLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 3:10-1108
Judge Sharp/Bryant/Brown

O R D E R
The settlement agreement the Magistrate Judge thought the
parties had reached has apparently blown up.
with

the

parties

on

June

26,

the

After a discussion

Magistrate

Judge

had

been

cautiously optimistic that the parties could solve it and in his
order concerning that telephone conference (Docket Entry No. 57) he
directed the parties to advise him by July 12, 2013, whether they
could still resolve the matter.

If they could not the defendant

was allowed to file a response to the plaintiff’s motion to amend
the complaint.

The parties have not advised the Magistrate Judge

that they are able to settle the case and, in fact, the defendant
has filed a response in opposition to the plaintiff’s motion to
amend (Docket Entry No. 58).
Accordingly, it appears that absent the request of the
parties there is nothing further that remains to be done by the
undersigned and the matter of the amendment is before Magistrate
Judge Bryant.
It is so ORDERED.
s/ Joe B. Brown
JOE B. BROWN
United States Magistrate Judge