Rehberger v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Filing 72

ORDER granting 69 Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/28/11. (dt)

ORDER:
_______
Motion granted.
s/ John S. Bryant
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
PAUL REHBERGER, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case No.: 3:11-cv-00085
Judge Kevin H. Sharp
Magistrate Judge John Bryant
Jury Trial Demanded

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.,
Defendant.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM IN
SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(b), Defendant Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”)
respectfully moves this Court for leave to file a Reply in support of its Motion to Compel
Responses to Honeywell's First Set of Requests for Admission. A copy of Defendant’s Reply
Memorandum is filed contemporaneously herewith as Exhibit A.
A reply memorandum is both necessary and appropriate to address inaccuracies and
arguments raised in Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition, filed on July 18, 2011 (Docket Entry
#64). A Reply will aid the Court in its resolution of the pending motion because it corrects
inaccurate statements made in the Response and responds to issues of law that were raised by
Plaintiffs in their Response.
For the foregoing reasons, and based on the entire record in this matter, Defendant
respectfully requests that the Court grant Defendant leave to file the Reply Memorandum and
that an Order deeming the Reply Memorandum filed be entered by the Court. A proposed Order
is attached hereto.