Rehberger v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Filing 83

ORDER granting 81 SEALED Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/24/11. (dt)

ORDER:
_______
Motion for leave is granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
PAUL REHBERGER, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
v.

Plaintiff,

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

s/ John S. Bryant
U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case No. 3:11-cv-0085
Judge Kevin Sharp
Magistrate Judge John Bryant
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
COMPLEX LITIGATION

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(b), Plaintiff Paul Rehberger respectfully moves this Court
for leave to file a Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel (Docket No. 66). A copy of
Plaintiff’s Reply Memorandum is filed contemporaneously herewith as Attachment 1.
A reply memorandum is both necessary and appropriate to address inaccuracies
contained in Defendant’s Opposition to the Motion (Docket No. 77) filed on August 8, 2011. A
Reply will aid the Court in its resolution of the pending motion because it corrects inaccurate
statements made in the Response and responds to issues of law that were raised by Defendant in
its Response.
For the foregoing reasons, and based on the entire record in this matter, Plaintiff
respectfully requests that the Court grant Plaintiff leave to file the Reply Memorandum and that
an

Order

deeming

the

Reply

Memorandum

1

filed

be

entered

by

the

Court.