Rippetoe et al v. Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC et al
Filing
15
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Motion to Amend Pleadings due by 8/31/2011. Discovery due by 12/30/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 1/31/2012. Jury Trial set for 6/12/2012 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Joe Brown. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/29/2012 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Joe Brown. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 4/29/11. (dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
RANDELL RIPPETOE, and his wife,
LAURA RIPPETOE
)
)
)
v.
Plaintiffs,
)
)
LOWE’S HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC, )
and JOHN DOE
)
)
Defendant.
)
No: 3:11-cv-124
JURY DEMAND
JUDGE NIXON
MAGISTRATE JUDGE BROWN
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Pursuant to Rule 16.01(d) of the Local Rules of the Court, the Parties have
conferred and have submitted this proposed initial case management order:
I.
Jurisdiction
Plaintiff submits that the Court’s jurisdiction in this case is predicated on Title 28
U.S.C. § 1332.
II.
Parties’ Theories of the Case
A.
Plaintiff’s Theory
On or about April 8, 2010 at approximately 2:00 p.m., Plaintiff RANDELL
RIPPETOE purchased 135 fencing boards from the Lowe’s Home Improvement Store
located at 3060 Mallory Lane in Franklin, Tennessee.
On said date, time and place, Plaintiff was instructed to proceed to the
contractor’s loading area of the property at 3060 Mallory Lane in Franklin, Tennessee.
On said date, time and place, Plaintiff positioned his pickup truck in the assigned
area and began to prepare to secure the lumber he bought.
On said date, time and place, Lowe’s Home Improvement employee, JOHN DOE,
in the scope and course of his duties, approached Plaintiff’s vehicle with the
aforementioned lumber on a forklift.
At said date, time and place, JOHN DOE, negligently lifted the load of lumber to
an unreasonable height in the air with the forklift he was operating.
At said date, time and place the lumber fell from that height and struck Plaintiff
causing serious bodily injury.
As a proximate result of Defendant JOHN DOE’s negligence in the operation of
said forklift, the Plaintiff has suffered serious and permanent physical injuries, pain and
suffering, incurred medical treatment and expenses, disability, and other damages and
expenses, for all of which the Defendant JOHN DOE is liable and Plaintiffs deserve to be
compensated.
Upon information and belief, Defendant, LOWE’S HOME IMPROVEMENT,
LLC, knew of, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known that Defendant,
JOHN DOE, who was the operator of the forklift that was involved in the accident
referenced herein, was not properly trained, skilled and/or supervised and should not have
been entrusted with the control of this dangerous heavy machinery for use in the course
and scope of its employer/employee relationship with Defendant, JOHN DOE.
Defendant, LOWE’S HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC, was negligent in its failure
to train and/or supervise Defendant JOHN DOE.
The negligence of Defendant, LOWE’S HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC, was the
proximate cause of the injuries sustained by Plaintiff.
B.
Theory of the Defendants- Lowe's denies any and all allegations
of negligence, fault and liability, including those above, and including those asserted in
the Complaint, as well as any other allegation of fault, liability and negligence as
against Lowe's or it's employees. Lowe's denies that it or it's employee negligently
operated the subject fork lift, negligently worked with the subject lumber, or in any way
acted negligently. Further, Lowe's denies that either Lowe's or their employee caused
the subject lumber in question to fall, and instead, it is asserted that it was the Plaintiff,
Randell Rippetoe whom caused the lumber to fall. This constitutes no negligence on
the part of Lowe's, and further, the Plaintiff's claims are barred, or shall be
proportionally reduced, pursuant to the Doctrine of comparative fault and comparative
negligence, due to Mr. Rippetoe causing the lumbar to fall, and due to any other fault or
negligence of the Plaintiff, Randell Rippetoe. Any fault and negligence of Randell
Rippetoe is imputed to Laura Rippetoe.
Further, the Defendants do not have sufficient
proof that the Plaintiff suffered any significant injury as a result of this, in that
discovery is not yet completed. As such, the Defendants deny the allegations of
injuries and damages as asserted by the Plaintiffs. Likewise, to the extent ( if
applicable after the discovery process is completed) that the Plaintiffs have failed to
mitigate their damages, the Defendants rely upon same as well. Additionally, the
Defendant's have pled in their Answer failure to join an indispensable party,
insufficiency of process and insufficiency of service of process, due to the wrong
Lowe's entity being sued, and due to a John Doe employee being stated in the
Complaint, and any said applicable defenses are relied upon in that regard as well. The
Parties have, however, submitted an order to the Court agreeing to substitute in the
correct Lowe's entity, Lowe's Home Centers Inc.
Additionally, the Plaintiff has filed
this case in Federal Court, however diversity of citizenship is not present if the John
Doe employee is a Tennessee Resident.
III.
Schedule of Pretrial Proceedings
1.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) initial disclosures shall be served by Friday, May
6, 2011.
2.
The deadline for plaintiff to disclose [in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P.
26(a)(2)] all experts is Friday, July 1,2011. Additionally, plaintiffs shall identify by
Friday, July 1, 2011, all treating health care providers who may testify at trial.
3.
The deadline for plaintiff to complete all expert depositions for evidence
(including treating health care providers) is September 30, 2011.
4.
The deadline for defendant to disclose [in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P.
26(a)(2)] all experts is October 31, 2011. As part of its expert disclosure, defendant shall
identify by October 31, 2011, all treating health care providers who may testify at trial.
The Defendants are entitled to an IME upon the Plaintiff by a health care provider of their
choice, at the Defendant's expense, and said IME, if elected, shall be performed by October
31, 2011. Any expert opinions to be used by Defendant shall be disclosed in
accordance with Rule 26 F.R.C.P, by November 21, 2011.
5.
The deadline for defendant to complete all expert depositions for evidence
(including treating health care providers) is December 23, 2011.
6.
Plaintiff shall have until Thursday, November 17, 2011, to complete any
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------rebuttal expert proof.
-------------------------7.
All discovery shall be completed by December 30, 2011.
8.
Dispositive motions shall be served and filed on or before January 31,
2012. Any response to a dispositive motion shall be filed within 21 days of the filing of
the motion. Any reply, limited to 5 pgs if necessary, shall be filed within one week of the filing of the
response.
9.
The parties request a trial in June 2012. The parties presently estimate that
trial will take two (2) days.
I.
Discovery Limitations
The Parties presently do not anticipate that enlargement of the discovery
limitations set for the in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be required. However,
the Parties reserve the right to request an enlargement from the Court should such
become necessary as discovery proceeds. No motions concerning discovery are to be
filed until after the parties have conferred in good faith, and unable to resolve their
differences, have scheduled and participated in a conference call with Judge Brown.
II.
Other Orders
The deadline for filing motions to amend the pleadings shall be Wednesday,
August 31, 2011, unless leave of Court is obtained for good cause shown.
III.
Status of Service of Process
The Defendant, LOWE’S HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC, was served on March
9, 2011. Defendant JOHN DOE has not been served, but service will be perfected upon
identification of said Defendant through discovery.
IV.
Status of Responsive Pleadings
The Answer of the Defendant LOWE’S HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC, was
filed on March 10, 2011.
V.
Prospects for Settlement Unknown at this time.
As parties have consented to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, a Jury Trial is
set for June 12, 2012 at 9:00 am with Final Pretrial Conference set for May 29, 2012
at 10:00 am.
APPROVED FOR ENTRY:
s/ Blair Durham____________
Blair Durham (021453)
Attorney for Plaintiff
1709 19th Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37212
(615) 252-9937
blair@durhamanddread.com
s/ Benjamin E. Winters______
Benjamin E. Winters (023970)
Attorney for Plaintiff
1709 19th Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37212
(615) 252-9937
ben@durhamanddread.com
s/ Richard Spicer___________
Richard Spicer (017572)
Attorney for Defendants
414 Union Street
Suite 1700
Nashville, TN 37219
(615) 259-9080
res@spicerfirm.com
_________________________________
MAGISTRATE JUDGE BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?